11 September 2006

Bush's 9/11 Speech

I just can't take it anymore. I'll let him say it, from tonight's address to the nation:

a totalitarian ideology that hates freedom, rejects tolerance, and despises all dissent.

He's talking about them, not us. But every time I run across stories like this, this, this, this, and this, I wonder.

Saddam is not the person who told the American public "Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." And speaking of....

I am often asked why we are in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the Nine-Eleven attacks. The answer is that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat. My Administration, the Congress, and the United Nations saw the threat – and after Nine-Eleven, Saddam’s regime posed a risk that the world could not afford to take.

Vintage Bush. Uhhh..................care to elaborate? We know it wasn't a 9/11 connection. We know it wasn't WMDs. You already lied about those and we busted you. But you never tell us in the speech what constitutes the "clear threat" now. Is it because he "hates freedom, rejects tolerance, and despises all dissent?" That kinda justifies us going into Africa and South America too, right? And what about Mexico?

And now the challenge is to help the Iraqi people build a democracy that fulfills the dreams of the nearly 12 million Iraqis who came out to vote in free elections last December.

A noble sentiment indeed. Maybe after we establish a democracy in Iraq, we can try establishing one here.

The terrorists fear freedom as much as they do our firepower. They are thrown into panic at the sight of an old man pulling the election lever … girls enrolling in school … or families worshiping God in their own traditions.


Okay. Now that's even funnier than the episode of "Two and a Half Men" that followed it. Except that this isn't funny anymore. Do you think Bin Laden was thinking about girls enrolling in school when he executed the attacks? Fire this speechwriter, NOW.

And you can say what you want about the connection to our region. He already told us he screwed up down here and turned his back on us. And it's obviously never going to change, because he is clearly preoccupied with war against "freedom." Please tell me that the Red States didn't buy this crap last night.

I'll prefer to let this one stand as the essential 9/11 speech.

I'm sick and tired of people questioning my patriotism. Yes, I support our troops, Mr. President. Just because I don't have a yellow ribbon and drape myself in the American Flag, it doesn't mean I'm not a "true" American. I'm exercising my right to question a war that was supported because of 9/11 patriotism. A war that was justified because you connected Saddam to Al Qaeda. And, as it turned out, a war that had nothing to do with 9/11, patriotism, terrorism and Al Qaeda. And, now as it turns out, is now being fought on some stupid abstract idea like "he hates freedom."

If that's the case, who's going to be America's liberator?

I now refuse to stand idle while people like the president accuse me of being un-American.

POST-SCRIPT: And don't tell me that I'm supposed to support our president and the Republican Party because "We're at war. You're supposed to support your country when it's at war." I REPEAT: We are at war because HE LIED ABOUT WHY WE NEEDED TO GO THERE. AND HE STILL HASN'T GIVEN A REASON WHY WE STILL NEED TO BE THERE. If we were just supposed to support a president because we're at war, wouldn't every president from here on out start a war (for just reasons or not) right before his re-election? Isn't that what he actually did?

TAGS: , , , ,

2 Comments:

At September 14, 2006 9:23 PM, Blogger Paul S. Pierce said...

Which did our fearless leader emphasize more:

A disaster that was just one year ago - caused by the government at many levels?

or

A disaster that happened 5 years ago & trying to scare the shit out of the country to gain votes for Republicans in the Fall?

The post has already answered this question.

Fly your New Orleans flag high - the USA doesn't want us.

Fly your American Flag upside down - it means you are in distress.

 
At March 09, 2009 2:59 AM, Blogger 漢美女 said...

(法新社a倫敦二B十WE四日電) 「情色二零零色情七」情趣產品大產自二十三日起AV女優在倫敦的肯辛頓奧林匹亞展覽館舉行av女優,倫敦人擺脫對性的保守態度踴躍參觀,許AVav穿皮A片衣與塑膠緊身衣的好色a片之徒擠進這項世界規模最大的成人生成人影片活展,估計三天展期可吸引八A片下載萬多好奇民眾參觀。

活動計畫負責人情色電影米里根承諾:「要搞浪漫、誘惑人、玩虐待,你渴望的我們都有。」

他說:「時髦的情色設計與華麗女裝,從吊飾到束腹到真人大小的雕塑,是我們由今年展出的數千件產a片下載品精選出的一部分,參情色電影展產品還包括時尚服飾、貼身女用內在美、鞋子、珠寶、玩具、影片、藝術、圖書及遊戲,更不要說性色情影片愛輔具及馬術裝備。」成人電影

參觀民眾遊覽兩百五十多個攤位,有性感服裝、玩具及情色食品,迎合各種品味。

大舞台上表演的情色是美國野蠻搖滾歌手瑪莉蓮曼森的前妻─全世界頭牌a片脫衣舞孃黛塔范提思,這是她今年在英國唯一一場色情表演。成人網站成人網站

以一成人影片九四零年代風格演出的黛塔范提思表演性感的天堂鳥、旋轉木馬及羽扇等舞蹈。

參展攤位成人電影有的推廣情趣用品,有的公開展示人體藝術和人體雕塑,也有情色藝術家工會成員提供建議。

 

Post a Comment

<< Home